I am told that in the U.S., vines are typically spaced in rows 6 feet
apart, with each row being 10 feet from the rows on either side. In Europe,
on the other hand, the vines are "crowded" more closely together (they
don't look all that crowded to me). That is, in the U.S., each vine is
given as much room as is needed to maximize its production. In Europe,
on the other hand, what decrease is found in the production per vine is
made up for by the increased number of vines per acre. The Europeans believe
that their method creates superior wine. There is a certain logic to it,
since vines which are under stress (crowding causes stress) do produce
superior wines.
The site is on an oversized lot, which measures nearly an acre. On the south and east sides, there are shallow creeks. The east creek has running water in it year-round, but the south creek dries up into stagnant ponds in the heat of summer. The depth of the water is normally up to 6 inches, and the width of the running water is perhaps 3 feet. However, since the creeks are part of the city's storm sewer system, during periods of heavy rain, the creek may grow to be as much as 30 feet across and several feet deep. Erosion on this part of the creek is not a problem (it is farther downstream); rather, the concern is with flooding.
Along both creeks are trees such as hackberry, elm(?), willow, and black walnut. Since the neighborhood is nearly 40 years old, many of the trees are beginning to die of disease, age, and water damage. The dead trees, while too close to the vines, do serve as habitat for a variety of birds.
About half of the property is in the 100-year flood plain. I decided to run the vines in two rows along the crest of the property, about the limit of the 100-year flood plain. The two rows will make an ersatz back fence for the property. For a number of reasons (such as in-ground pipes for the sprinkler system), the holes were not dug in a perfectly orderly fashion, and, at the far south end, three rows were begun. However, since this is a home vineyard rather than a commercial venture which must have perfect rows to accomodate machinery, I decided not to worry about it.
The two rows (the third row is very short) are only about 5 feet part, with each vine being about 6 feet from its neighbor. I felt that this spacing would not be overly damaging, since there are only two rows for most of the length, which means that the vines will be able to grow away from each other.
The two rows of the holes for the vines, still facing south, with a
clearer view of the trees in the south creek. Note that the holes are along
the lip of the high ground, just about the 100-year flood plain.
After the hole was dug, I put about .75 cubic feet of river rock into
the bottom of the whole for drainage. In the center, the rock is 4 or 5
inches deep.
After the rock, I added about 1 cubic foot of peat moss. Not only does
the heavy clay soil need to be amended to make it lighter, the peat moss
will add acid.
After the peat moss, I mixed the dirt dug out of the hole with a lot
of "organic matter" and 8 quarts of vermiculite. By "organic matter", I
mean the stuff raked up by the diggers as they cleared some of the creekside
area on the property. This is not high quality compost - which would
be bad for the vines anyway - rather, it is leaves, twigs, roots, and probably
even some poison ivy vines. Hence the name of the vineyard, since poison
ivy grows in abundance in the creek beds.
I added several barrows full of the amended soil, mounding the soil
in anticipation of the eventual compacting of the organic matter and the
peat moss beneath. It takes about 30 minutes to mix the material and fill
each hole. No, I didn't dig the holes; that was done by a crew from a local
landscaping company - I highly recommend this if you have thirty holes!
Copyright © 1999 by William J. McCalpin. All rights reserved.